Though how Progressive a Country is, there will always be Poverty because of Corruption

Though how Progressive a Country is, there will always be

Poverty because of Corruption

By Apolinario Villalobos

 

Perfection should be ruled out in the reckoning of a progressive country, because there will always be poverty due to corruption somewhere in the system of governance. In other words, the glitter of progress cannot hide poverty. For ultra-progressive countries, the signs may be insignificant as they try to blend with the glamour of urbanity. But in other countries, especially, the third-world, the signs are very prevalent, so that there is always a massive effort to cover them up occasionally, literally, as it is done every time there are special occasions such as visits of foreign dignitaries. This practice is successful in the Philippines.

 

Practically, poverty is the shadow of progress, and literally, too, as where there are looming high-rise buildings that are pockmarks of progress, not far from them are slums or homeless citizens who huddle together under bridges and nooks. These are misguided citizens who flock to the cities after selling their homestead, that have been farmed for several generations, to deceitful land developers, at a measly price. These are the urban squatters willing to be relocated but found out that the promised “paradise” do not even have a deep well so they go back to their sidewalk “homes”. These are contractual workers who have no job securities as they earn only for five to six months, after which they leave their fate to luck while looking for another job.

 

How does corruption ever be involved in the sad fate of the exploited? Simply, by the government’s negligence  in providing decent relocation sites with job opportunities and basic facilities to those uprooted from their city abodes for more than so many years; by its cuddling of the spurious contractualization perpetrated by greedy employers; by its failure to guide and protect the rights of farmers who sell their rice fields to subdivision developers at measly prices that are not even enough to sustain them for six months; by its failure to provide the citizens with the basic necessities as funds are allowed to be pocketed by corrupt officials; and practically by looking the other way despite the availability of laws against vote buying.

 

Third- world country leaders should stop using the word “progressive”, but instead they should use “surviving” to describe their respective economy. If a country’s economy cannot sustain, much less, provide a “comfortable life” to majority of its citizens, then it is still “ailing”…hence, expect poverty to be trailing behind, just a few steps away from the pretentious allegations!

 

 

 

Nagiging OA ang mga Militanteng Grupo…nakakawalang ganang panigan tuloy!

Nagiging OA ang mga Militanteng Grupo

…nakakawalang ganang panigan tuloy!

ni Apolinario Villalobos

 

Malaking bagay ang nagagawa ng mga militante sa pagpapaliwanag ng mga bagay na nangyayari sa ating bansa, sa iba’t ibang larangan lalo na sa ekonomiya at pulitika. Kung baga ay sila ang tagapag-gising ng mga Pilipino dahil sa ingay na ginagawa nila. Subalit ang magpasimula sila ng karahasan o violence tuwing may rally ay hindi maganda.

 

Ang pinakabagong pangyayaring mababanggit tungkol dito ay ang APEC Summit sa Manila.Sinamahan pa ang mga local na mga militante ng mga kasapakat o kaalyado na galing sa ibang bansa. Hindi nagkulang ang mga local na pamahalaang nakakasaklaw ng mga lugar na kinampuhan ng mga grupong militante sa pagbigay ng kaluwagan. Ang mga ahensiya naman ng gobyerno ay hindi nagkulang sa pagbigay ng paalala, lalo na sa mga schedule ng pagsara ng mga kalsada at babala kung hanggang saan lang dapat ang mga raleyista. Subalit may mga balitang nagpipilit pa rin ang mga militanteng grupo sa pagpapakita ng “tapang” sa pamamagitan ng pagsugod sa hanay ng  mga nakaharang lamang na mga pulis.

 

Ayon sa mga field reporter ng radio, ang mga grupo ng mga militante ang unang nangdadarag o nagpo-provoke sa hanay ng mga kapulisan na humaharang sa kanila sa pamamagitan ng pag-agaw ng kanilang mga truncheon o kalasag at pagtutulak sa mga ito. Mabuti na lang at hindi natitinag ang disiplina ng mga kapulisan na nagpakita ng matinding pasensiya sa kabila ng nakakatulig na pagmumura mula sa mga estudyanteng militante.

 

Narinig ko mismo ang live coverage sa isang pangyayaring pinarinig ng isang AM radio station. Sa background ng coverage ay maririnig ang tilian at sigawan ng mga nagra-rally, na sinisingitan ng komento ng reporter kung paanong itulak ng mga estudyante ang mga pulis na ang iba ay inaagawan pa ng kalasag, subalit nang gumanti ng tulak ang mga pulis, narinig agad ang pagsigaw ng isang estudyanteng: “….hayan mga kababayan, nakikita ninyo ang karahasan ng mga pulis…”. Napamura tuloy ako – pero sa hangal na estudyanteng lider pa man din yata ng grupo. Sila itong nanguna sa pagtulak, pero sila pa ang may ganang magreklamo at magpakita sa taong bayan na sila ay inaapi ng mga pulis!

 

May nagsabi sa akin na karamihan sa mga militanteng grupo sa Pilipinas ay sinusupurtahan ng mga Komunistang lumalaban sa Demokrasya, kaya kung mapapansin, dominante sa mga kulay na ginagamit nila sa mga streamers at banners ay pula, simbolo ng komunismo at sosyalismo. Isa sa mga pinag-aaralan din daw nila ay kung paanong epektibong makadarag o maka-provoke ng mga anti-riot police na humaharang sa kanilang daraanan tungo sa mga bawal na gustong pagdausan nila ng rally, tulad ng harapan ng mga embassy, Mendiola, at Malakanyang. Maituturing na nagtagumpay sila sa pag-provoke kung papaluin na sila ng mga pulis na makukunan ng retrato. Nang mabisto ang strategy nilang ito, gumamit na lang ng water cannon ang mga anti-riot police.

 

Sa ganang akin, hindi masama ang mag-rally pero dapat ay sa tamang paraan,  sa pamamagitan ng pagrespeto sa mga itatalagang alituntunin ng mga ahensiya, lalo na ng mga local na pamahalaang masasakop ng aktibidad. Kung ano ang bawal, dapat ay sundin. Kahit saan ay pwedeng gawin ang rally dahil kokoberan naman talaga ito ng mga reporter ng diyaryo, radio at TV. Kahit halimbawa ay laban sa Kongreso na nasa bandang Quezon City ang rally, ito ay maaaring gawin sa Luneta o Liwasang Bonifacio o sa bakuran ng UP, atbp.  Ang ilalabas naman sa TV, diyaryo at ibo-broadcast sa radio na layunin ay aabot pa rin sa lahat ng sulok ng Pilipinas. Dahil dito, hindi kailangang mag-provoke ng mga pulis na naatasan lamang na magmintina ng kaayusan at pumigil sa anumang pinsala na mangyayari, upang masabing nagpakita ang mga ito ng “police brutality”. Trabaho lang ang ginagawa ng mga pulis. Maaaring marami rin sa kanila ang galit sa gobyerno pero hindi lang nila mailabas…yan ang dapat ding isipin ng mga nagra-rally.

 

Hindi kailangang sumigaw na ang background ay Congress o Malakanyang dahil ang importanteng malaman ng mga Pilipino ay mensahe ng mga nagsasalita sa rally. Bakit kailangan pang may masaktan o dumanak ng dugo? Paanong papanigan ng maraming Pilipino ang mga bistado nang mga komunistang nagra-rally, kung sila mismo ay naninira ng mga gamit ng mga embassy, plant boxes, poste ng ilaw, nang-aagaw ng truncheon ng pulis na nakaharang lamang sa kanila, at nag-iiwan ng basura mula sa sinunog na mga effigy, at mga balot ng pinagkainan nila, pati mga basyo ng mineral water?

 

Dahil sa hindi magandang gawi ng mga militanteng nagra-rally, ipinapakita nila na kailangan pang maging marahas upang magtagumpay sa pagpaparating ng mga mensahe. May napagtagumpayan ba naman sila? Hindi na ba pwedeng gumamit ng mahinahong paraan? Ang orihinal at tunay na layunin ng rally ay upang magkaroon ng pagkakataon ang mga grupong makapagparating ng kanilang mga hinaing sa mga kinauukulan. Nasira lamang ang layuning ito nang makarating sa bansa ang ideyolohiyang sosyalismo na ang pamamaraan sa pagtamo ng inaasam ay idinadaan sa karahasan.

 

Kawawa ang mga Pilipinong ang kaisipan  ay hindi na nga “nahinog” sa ideyolohiyang Demokrasya na ibinigay ng mga Amerikano, ay ginulo pa ng “Sosyalismo” na talaga namang hindi angkop sa kultura ng mga ito na nakasalig sa mga relihiyong Kristiyanismo at Islam!

 

Kalaban din ako ng korapsyon pero malayo sa isip ko ang patayan o pagdanak ng dugo upang matanggal lamang ito sa gobyerno…

 

Who is Ninoy Aquino?…some revealing notes about the guy who gave Marcos a headache

Who is Ninoy Aquino?

…some revealing notes about the guy

who gave Marcos a headache

Apolinario Villalobos

For political observers, Benigno Simeon Aquino, Jr. was the impediment that stood in the way of Ferdinand Marcos in the latter’s quest for ultimate power which he eventually got, when he declared Martial Law. When it was declared in September 21, 1972, a Thursday, Aquino was the first “casualty”, with no other than Col. Romeo Gatan, a personal friend from way back when the latter was the head of the Constabulary in Tarlac, serving the warrant of arrest.  Senator Aquino was then, attending a meeting on tariff concerns at Room 1701 of Manila Hilton. The arrest was so timed minutes after the “ambush” of Juan Ponce Enrile, one of the planners of Martial Law which was translated into Presidential Decree 1081. Later, it was revealed that the ambush was “staged” to finally give Marcos the green light to declare Martial Law.

As a flashback, Ninoy Aquino was among the “escorts” of Imelda Romualdez who was three years older than him, when she came to Manila from Tacloban. During the time, Imelda was employed by the P.E. Domingo Music Store along Escolta, singing and playing for potential customers. Later, she was employed by the Central Bank as a clerk. Aquino would fetch her from the music store for strolls in Luneta, or to enjoy the sunset from Manila Bay promenade while sharing sandwiches. In time, however, their intimacy stopped, as according to stories, Aquino said that Imelda was too tall for him. In 1954, Ninoy married Corazon Cojuangco.

Born on November 27, 1932, Ninoy Aquino had no outstanding scholastic accomplishment. He even admitted that during his college days, he would skip classes to participate in political campaigns and worked as a copywriter at the Manila Times. At the outbreak of the Korean War, he volunteered for a field assignment in that country – at the age of eighteen. As a young correspondent, he became close to Marguerite Higgins, a popular journalist of the New York Herald Tribune, and who was known for her anti-Communist views. He earned such special friendship with Higgins when he volunteered to drive for her at times.

Aquino was a typical intrepid and adventurous journalist who took every opportunity that came his way. He was able to interview Chiang Kai-shek who told him that, “the internal problems of Asia can never be solved until the root causes – the Kremlin and Peiping are crushed” (today, becoming true). He covered nationalistic uprisings in Europe that were crushed by prevailing powers. He was also in Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia. Out of his observations from these travels, he expressed that:

To the Asian, the western argument that “if communism wins, Asians stand to lose their

Liberties”, is meaningless. To the Asian now jailed by the French in the numerous prisons of Vietnam for being “too nationalistic”, civil liberties have no meaning. To the Asian jailed on St. John’s Island in Singapore, for possessing intelligence and nationalistic spirit above the average, civil liberties are likewise meaningless. The Filipino is aware of and has enjoyed America’s benevolence; but to the rest of Asia, the American looks like the Frenchman, the Britisher and the Dutchman. To Asians, these people are the symbols of oppressions. And, many Asians would prefer Communism to western oppression.

Aquino had fervent personal quests driven perhaps by the political blood that flowed through his veins. His grandfather had been a general during the revolution against the Spanish colonists and later, against the Americans. His father served as a senator, speaker of the Assembly and a cabinet Minister. On the other hand, Ninoy who was dubbed “perpetual talking machine”, was elected Mayor at the age of twenty-two, the youngest ever. He also became the youngest vice-governor in 1957, and later, youngest governor at the age of twenty-eight. At the age of thirty-two, he became the youngest senator of the Philippines.

The greyish side of Ninoy’s life casts a gloomy shadow over the story on the “Taruc surrender”. He was an adviser of President Ramon Magsaysay, then, and as such he was involved in the preparation of “position papers”. According to Aquino’s version of the “Taruc surrender” story, he sought the approval of Magsaysay to meet with the Huk Supremo, which he successfully did after trekking over mountain trails and through dense forests. Months later, Taruc surrendered.

Unfortunately, Taruc himself, revealed the true story behind his surrender which was caused by fear for his life inside the Communist party due to internal squabble for leadership. This has been corroborated by Ed Lansdale of CIA, who said that the surrender of Taruc was already settled, but when Aquino learned about it, he “rushed into the hills to grab some glory”. Most importantly, Lansdale also insisted that contrary to what Aquino claimed and boasted, he never worked with the CIA.

The CIA story that floated around the life of Aquino came about when in 1954, he was sent to the United States by Magsaysay to observe “training methods in American spy schools”. Although denying that he had a “contract” with the CIA, Aquino was steadfast in his claim of “working” with its people, which the agency vehemently denied, especially, its Manila officials. Aquino, however, voluntarily provided the agency with information, as claimed by the officials. There was also a story on his working with the CIA to overthrow President Sukarno, which was also denied by Joseph Smith, who at the time was the CIA official in Indonesia.

When Marcos tried a tough stance in taking back Sabah from Malaysia, Aquino exposed the plan, part of which was the secret training of “commandos” in Corregidor, but who were not told about their secret mission. Expectedly, when the issue exploded, there was a furor that led to the so-called “Jabidah massacre”.

A story also came out about the “other” plan of Aquino to come home from exile in the US, via Malaysia with the help of Iqbal, moving spirit behind the Bangsamoro autonomy. Unfortunately, this did not materialize, because Ninoy flew straight to Manila where he met the fatal end of his political career – on the tarmac of the Manila International Airport 1, now named after him, to honor his “martyrdom”. Because of that story, observers on the issue of the Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL), now, Basic Law for the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region (BL-BAR), are one in saying that Pnoy has a reason for insisting the passing of the Law before he comes down in 2016.

Both Ferdinand Marcos and Ninoy Aquino had many things in common: both were charismatic, gifted orators, dashing and popular, and great “prevaricators” as put in by observers, especially, the Americans who knew them well.

Bibili daw ang Pilipinas ng mga Barko…at may nanalo nang bidder, ang Japan

Bibili daw ang Pilipinas ng mga Barko
….at may nanalo nang bidder, ang Japan
Ni Apolinario Villalobos

Narinig ko ang balitang binabanggit sa titulo nitong blog habang kumakain ako ng almusal. May binanggit na bilang kung ilan, subalit nang banggitin na ang mga lugar kung saan ang mga ito ihihimpil ay muntik na akong mabulunan. Ang mga binanggit ay puro sa Luzon – Manila, La Union at Palawan. WALANG MAPUPUNTA SA VISAYAS AT MINDANAO!

Isa na namang kabobohan ng kung sinuman ang may ideya ng distribution ng mga barko na ang mga gamit daw ay para sa search and rescue, at relief operations. Sa Luzon lang ba may dapat ma-rescue at gumawa ng relief operations? Ang Mindanao, lalo na ang bandang southern part ay piniperhuwisyo ng Abu Sayyaf kidnappers na gumagamit ng kumpit…bakit hindi ito tapatan ng Coast Guard at Philippine Navy? Mahina ang control sa southern entrance/exit kaya dito dumadaan ang mga tumatakas sa batas, at paboritong lusutan ng mga kontrabando. Ang Visayas naman ay binubuo ng mga isla – malalaki at maliliit, kaya kailangan ding mayroong nakatalagang mga barko sa mga istratehikong daungan.

Natataranta ngayon ang pamahalaan dahil sa nangyayari sa West Philippine Sea na dapat siguro ay ibalik na lang sa tawag na South China Sea, malinaw na rin lang na walang magagawa ang Pilipinas sa kaswapangan ng mga lider ng Tsina. Bakit ngayon lang sila natataranta? Saan napunta ang perang galing sa pinagbentahan ng Fort Bonifacio noon pa man, na dapat sana ay para sa modernisasyon ng hukbong sandatahan ng Pilipinas? Sapat na ba ang biniling second hand na mga helicopter at mga armas, ganoong bilyones ang dapat na napunta sa proyektong ito?

Ang Pilipinas ay binubuo ng mga isla kaya ang kailangan ay mga sasakyang pandagat at panghimpapawid tulad ng helicopter man lang at mga modernong barko para sa Coast Guard at Philippine Navy. Hindi kailangan ng Pilipinas ang fighter planes dahil wala rin namang mapapala sa harap ng mga naghihigantihang ginagamit ng mga karatig-bansa lalo na ng Tsina. Ang inaasahan kasi ng Pilipinas ay ang iniiwang mga bulok na gamit-pandigma ng mga Amerikano pagkatapos ng “Balikatan exercises” taon-taon!

Nakakahiya ang Pilipinas…. dahil halos wala nang mukhang maiharap sa buong mundo lalo pa sa panahon ngayong tadtad ito ng mga problema na gawa mismo ng mga tiwaling opisyal sa pamahalaan!…at ang pinakakawawa ay ang mga Pilipino!

Magtataka pa ba tayo kung bakit gustong ihiwalay ng BIFF ang isang bahagi ng Mindanao mula sa Pilipinas? At hindi malayong mag-isip din ng ganito ang mga taga-Visayas – magkaroon man lang ng self-governing na rehiyon tulad ng nasa Cordillera at ang umiiral sa ngayon na ARMM, na kung matutuloy ay papalitan ng Bangsamoro. Pero, paano na ang sinasabi ngayon ng MNLF na gusto rin nila ng sariling rehiyon?